Start the new year off by supporting a good bill to protect the rights of Idaho students beyond the age of 18.
House Bill 597 would amend existing law to allow students of majority age to submit a signed statement for exemption from immunization requirements.
This bill would also prevent colleges and universities in the state of Idaho from infringing on the privacy rights of students by requiring vaccination status or the disclosure of confidential medical information as a condition of enrollment or attendance.
Medical, religious, and philosophical vaccine exemptions already exist for our students up to the age of 18. Let’s work to ensure the rights of our older students as well.
This bill will be heard on Wednesday, Feb 28, 2024, in the House Health and Welfare Committee.
Help us say YES to the right to vaccinate exceptions for all students!
TAKE ACTION
- Contact your Idaho State Representative and urge him or her to SUPPORT H597.
You can look up who represents you at https://legislature.idaho.gov/legislators/
(Click the Who’s My Legislator tab.)
- Submit public testimony to the House Health and Welfare Committee prior to their hearing on Wednesday, February 28, 2024. Public testimony will be taken by registering through the following link on the evening of the 27th. Registration Links will be added as legislation / becomes available. Register to Testify
- Contact the House and Health and Welfare Committee and ask them to vote YES on H597.
Just copy and paste the email addresses below and put VOTE YES on House Bill 597 in the subject line. In the body of your email, say why you think students over the age of 18 should have the right to vaccine exemptions.
JVanderWoude@house.idaho.gov, MErickson@house.idaho.gov, MBlanksma@house.idaho.gov, MKingsley@house.idaho.gov,
BMitchell@house.idaho.gov, CDixon@house.idaho.gov, JGallagher@house.idaho.gov, DHealey@house.idaho.gov, JRedman@house.idaho.gov, SChew@house.idaho.gov, IRubel@house.idaho.gov,
NRoberts@house.idaho.gov
For members of the public to observe the meeting, please click on the following link: https://www.idahoptv.org/shows/idahoinsession/ww54/
Calls are more effective than emails and only take a few minutes. Below is a sample script. Use your own words when you call or email – a personal message is always more effective than a form message!
Sample script:
“Hi, my name is ____, and I am a constituent. I am calling to ask Representative ____ to SUPPORT H597, which would protect students over the age of eighteen by ensuring rights to vaccine exemptions.
Existing exemptions apply only to minor children and require a parent or legal guardian’s signature.
Currently, there is no codified exemption when a student is 18 years old during their 12th-grade school year.
This important bill would also prevent colleges and universities in the state of Idaho from infringing on the privacy rights of students by requiring vaccination status or the disclosure of confidential medical information as conditions of enrollment or attendance.
Students of all ages should have the legal right to vaccine exemptions and medical privacy.
I urge Representative _____ to support H597 to protect older students.”
Talking Points:
Keep your call or email short! Pick the 2 or 3 talking points most important to you and explain why this issue matters to you personally.
- Share why this is personal to you. Do you have philosophical or religious beliefs that conflict with vaccination? Have you or someone you know had a vaccine reaction?
- Idaho currently allows for medical, religious, and philosophical vaccine exemptions for students under eighteen years of age but does not legally protect older students. This oversight needs to be rectified and solidified into law.
- Vaccine makers and the healthcare providers who administer them bear zero liability for vaccine injuries and deaths. The vaccine manufacturers reap all the profits from vaccines without having to pay for any of the injuries or harm. https://www.nvic.org/newsletter/mar-2011/no-pharma-liability-no-vaccine-mandates
- The claimed justification – that unvaccinated individuals pose a health risk to others – is unsupported in the medical literature. In fact, vaccinated individuals can pose a greater risk to public health due to a process known as shedding. Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles, and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterward and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. https://www.westonaprice.org/studies-show-that-vaccinated-individuals-spread-disease/
- No one knows in advance whom a vaccine will harm. Each of us may respond differently as we have different medical histories, genes, epigenetics, and microbiomes.
- Vaccines are medical procedures that carry a risk of serious injury. Hundreds of thousands have reported an adverse reaction to vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The U.S. Government has paid out approximately $5.1 billion as of January 2024 to the victims of vaccine injury, per VICP Data Reports. https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/vicp-stats-01-01-24.pdf
- There have already been 2,597,111 Covid-19 shot adverse events and 36,650 Covid-19 shot deaths reported in the U.S. to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (per data released 1/26/24).
Run your own search – https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Cases (adverse events) – https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php
Deaths – https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX%5B%5D=COVID19&DIED=Yes
- Vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline have paid billions of dollars in criminal penalties and settlements for research fraud, faking drug safety studies, failing to report safety problems, bribery, kickbacks, and false advertising.[i] [ii] Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in 2009 alone to resolve criminal and civil allegations. [iii]
Read the bill here:
[i] https://www.corp-research.org/merck
[ii] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jul/03/glaxosmithkline-fined-bribing-doctors-pharmaceuticals?CMP=share_btn_fb
[iii] https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617
🖨️ Print post
Leave a Reply