data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95967/95967fc2b49faacc1a831a5a77530ba1ba0ef0b8" alt="Support A Good Bill In Idaho!"
Speak up for a good bill in the Idaho legislature to halt risky mRNA shots.
S 1036, also known as the Doug Cameron Act, establishes a moratorium on administering any gene therapy product—by any route or modality—used for infectious disease.
This critical measure safeguards the health and safety of Idaho citizens, regardless of whether such administration is labeled as an immunization, vaccine, or any other term that fits the definition of a vaccine.
S 1036 was removed from the Senate Health and Welfare Committee hearing scheduled for 2/17/2025, but it can be brought up for a vote anytime.
Your voice is crucial in ensuring the success of this vital legislation. We urge you to act today!
TAKE ACTION
- Contact Senate Health and Welfare Committee Members and respectfully ask them to SUPPORT S 1036. https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/standingcommittees/SHW/ (Click the MEMBERS tab)
We encourage you to contact all committee members and specifically call the office of the Senate Health & Welfare Chair, Senator Julie Van Orden, at (208) 332-1346 and politely ask for a vote for the Doug Cameron Bill. - Contact your Idaho State Senator and urge him or her to SUPPORT S 1036.
You can look up who represents you at https://legislature.idaho.gov/legislators/ (Click the Who’s My Legislator tab)
Calls are more effective than emails and only take a few minutes. Below is a Sample Script along with additional Talking Points. Use your own words when you call or email – a personal message is always more effective than a form message!
SAMPLE SCRIPT:
“My name is _____, and I reside in (town). I am calling to urge Committee Member or (Senator)______ to lend his (or her) support to S 1036, known as the Doug Cameron Act.
This critical legislation would place a moratorium on administering any gene therapy product used for infectious diseases in Idaho. It is necessary to protect the health and safety of Idaho citizens from experimental mRNA-based vaccines that have not been thoroughly evaluated for long-term safety and efficacy.
Several Idaho counties have already taken steps to limit the availability of Covid shots. These actions reflect growing public concern over the risks associated with mRNA vaccines.
Doug Cameron’s story is a tragic example of why this bill is needed. Once a strong, fit, and vital man, Doug suffered a catastrophic injury from a Covid shot. He survived but is now paralyzed from the diaphragm down and will spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair.
He is not alone—millions of Americans have reported adverse reactions to these shots. As of January 1, 2025, VAERS data shows 1,660,413 adverse events and 38,398 deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines. These numbers indicate serious risks that cannot be ignored.
I urge Committee Member or (Senator) _____to stand with the people of Idaho and SUPPORT S 1036 to safeguard public health, medical freedom, and informed consent.”
TALKING POINTS for calls and emails:
Keep your email short! Pick the 2 or 3 of these talking points – or none of them — that are most important to you, and be sure to explain why this issue matters to you personally.
- Share why this is personal to you. Have you or someone you know had a vaccine reaction?
- mRNA “vaccines” represent a new, untested gene therapy technology lacking long-term, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy studies. Without this data, the people of Idaho are being subjected to an ongoing experiment with unknown consequences.
- S 1036 ensures that Idaho citizens are protected until safety data is available and can be reviewed by the legislature.
- Manufacturers initially claimed their Covid shots were 95 percent effective. The CDC now admits Covid shots do not prevent Covid. For this reason alone, people should not be subjected to the injections. https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-vaccine-updates-08-05-21/h_d2accec79fdc37f422d02c536828ea1e
- Covid shot manufacturers and providers are shielded from liability through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act. The only option for compensating people injured by COVID-19 vaccines is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). Only eight percent of all petitioners since 2010 have been awarded compensation through the CICP. No legal or medical expert fees are covered, no pain and suffering is awarded, lost wages are capped at $50,000 per year, and there is no judicial appeal. In other words, the victims will be severely under-compensated while the pharmaceutical companies get rich.
Prep Act – https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/Pages/default.aspx
Coverage by CCIP (see p. 7, Oct 2021) – https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10584
“Vaccine injury compensation programs overwhelmed as congressional reform languishes” (6/1/2022) – https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/01/vaccine-injury-compensation-programs-overwhelmed-as-congressional-reform-languishes-00033064
- There have already been 1,660,413 Covid-19 shot adverse events and 38,398 Covid-19 shot deaths reported in the U.S. to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (per data released 1/26/24).
Run your own search – https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Cases (adverse events) – https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php
Deaths – https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX%5B%5D=COVID19&DIED=Yes
- There are no long-term studies of Covid-19 shots on the safety, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, or effect on reproduction.
- Covid injections were not properly tested and are dangerous, as confirmed by Pfizer’s own documents. https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/pfizer-documents-confirm-covid-injections-are-dangerous/#gsc.tab=0
- Vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline have paid billions of dollars in criminal penalties and settlements for research fraud, faking drug safety studies, failing to report safety problems, bribery, kickbacks, and false advertising [1,2]. Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in 2009 alone to resolve criminal and civil allegations [3].
[1] Merck ($2 billion, 2007) – https://www.corp-research.org/merck
[2] GlaxoSmithKline ($3 billion, 2012) – https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jul/03/glaxosmithkline-fined-bribing-doctors-pharmaceuticals?CMP=share_btn_fb
[3] Pfizer – https://abcnews.go.com/Business/pfizer-fined-23-billion-illegal-marketing-off-label/story?id=8477617
MORE INFORMATION
To view the text, status, and history of the bill click here: https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/S1036/
Read these articles for more information on the dangers of Covid shots:
Leave a Reply