Page 83 - Spring2009
P. 83

Tim’s DVD Reviews








                  Naughton returns to his doctor to tell him what  was mainly about the benefits of vitamin D, with some small coverage of
                  he has been eating (hamburgers, fried chicken,  vitamin A and cod liver oil at the end, he goes into detail about vitamin
                  eggs, etc.). The doctor is naturally unimpressed  A toxicity and cod liver oil toxicity. He does show some discernment in
                  and starts collecting vital statistics to assess the  recognizing that cod liver oil was shown to be beneficial in the 1930s,
                  damage. First is the weigh-in. Mr. Naughton  that many modern brands are different due to over processing and high
                  is now 194 pounds. Already his doctor has a  vitamin A to D ratios. He says there is an ideal ratio between A and D but
                  puzzled look on his face and says,“I don’t like  he doesn’t know what it is. And he knows there is considerable variation
                  what you’re proving here.” Cholesterol was 222  between modern brands of cod liver oil.
                  and body fat was 28.2 percent. The good doctor   He then takes a mix of studies, some on vitamin A, some on cod
                  tried to argue with the results but admittedly  liver oil, throws these apples and oranges into the hopper and pulls out
                  really couldn’t.                          some results he believes are adequate to make blanket condemnations of
                      This film gets a thumbs up but you do need to  all cod liver oil. He doesn’t seem to grasp the fine point that the Weston
                  be careful what you take away from it. The infor-  A. Price Foundation has been saying for years, namely that not just any
                  mation from the various experts he interviewed  cod liver oil is OK. His reasoning gets even more chaotic when he brings
                  is impeccable. If a viewer wanted to, however,  evolution into the discussion. He claims that to know how much vitamin
                  he might jump to the conclusion that living on  A humans need, we need to look at how much we needed in our evolu-
                  the “right kind” of fast food is okay (it’s not, just  tionary development. To figure that out, we must look at the great apes.
                  in case you’re wondering).                I know it is controversial and politically incorrect to say this, but there
                      “Fat Head” is an entertaining way to under-  are reputable scientists (not all of whom are religious zealots) who don’t
                  score the fact that saturated animal fat is not the  unquestioningly accept evolution over long periods by chance mutations
                  deadly poison it is cracked up to be even when  as fact. But let’s suppose it is a fact. I remember hearing years ago that
                  present in the industrial fast food supply. And it  the idea that humans evolved from apes was abandoned in favor of both of
                  is reassuring to know that “No fat people were  us evolving from a common ancestor. Also, as one of the listeners during
                  harmed during the making of this documen-  the call pointed out, vegetarian apes are pretty shaky examples on which
                  tary.”                                    to base human nutritional needs.
                                                                The other glaring problem with his reasoning in general is his insis-
                  Dr. Mercola’s Conference Call             tence on taking a reductionist, fragmented view of nutrition. As Chris
                  with Dr. John Cannell                     Masterjohn has made clear in several articles, all of the fat-soluble vitamins
                                                            must be present, balanced and working together. Despite paying some lip
                      This audio recording (no longer posted on  service to this reality, Dr. Cannell keeps pulling isolated nutrients out of
                  the internet) picks up somewhere after the call  the line-up and examining how they might work by themselves. That’s the
                  began. Dr. Mercola initiated the conference call  problem. They don’t. He managed to come up with sixteen experts who
                  and we hear at least two other women on the line  agreed with him, which apparently implies the case is closed. I continue
                  with occasional questions and comments. One  to insist that the truth is not up to a vote.
                  woman seems very impressed with everything    Dr. Cannell may be well-intentioned and I’m sure he has done a lot
                  Dr. Cannell says while the other is clearly not  of work. I’m sure he’s very intelligent. He brought up a very interesting
                  buying all of it. Dr. Mercola is non-committal  observation that high vitamin D levels raise glutathione levels, greatly
                  for the most part.                        reducing mercury toxicity. He was so certain that very high levels of vi-
                      After making it clear that his paper (not yet  tamin D make one almost immune to mercury that he bandied about the
                  released at the time of this recording but eventu-  idea of drinking mercury at large demonstrations to prove the point. Cod
                  ally published in the November, 2008 issue of  liver oil is toxic but mercury is OK. . . . I can’t help wondering whether he
                  Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology)  has already experimented. That would explain. . . everything.

                  SPRING 2009                                Wise Traditions                                           81
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88