Page 80 - Spring2010
P. 80

Legislative Updates



                        NAIS FIGHT OVER FOR THE MOMENT, FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION FIGHT LOOMS
                                                        By Judith McGeary, Esq.




                                          February 5th brought a surprising announce-  own consumption, based on the theory that this
                                      ment from the USDA. Secretary Vilsack stated   local non-commercial activity could affect inter-
                                      that the National Animal Identification System   state commerce if one looked at the cumulative
                                      (NAIS) would be scrapped and replaced with a   impact of everyone engaging in such activity.
                                      “new framework for animal diseases traceabil-  Wickard and similar cases led to a great expan-
                                      ity.” NAIS would have required every person   sion in the scope of federal regulation. Yet it does
                                      who owned even one livestock or poultry ani-  not mean that every use of the term “interstate
                                      mal to register their property with the state and   commerce” covers intrastate activity.
                                      federal government, tag each animal when it left      This issue was raised in a conference call
                                      its birthplace (in most cases using microchips or   between Secretary Vilsack and the organizations
                                      Radio Frequency Identification Devices), and re-  that had participated in last year’s roundtable
                                      port a long list of movements within twenty-four   in DC, including the Farm and Ranch Freedom
                                      hours. In contrast, the new framework will cover   Alliance. Secretary Vilsack stated that the new
                                      only animals moved in interstate commerce and   program would track animals that crossed state
                                      will encourage the use of lower-cost technology.  lines so as to trace them back to their state of
                                                                                 origin, and that any intrastate tracking was the

                      Judith McGeary   A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE                      decision of the state. I followed up by asking
                    is an attorney and     In the fact sheet that accompanied USDA’s   whether the USDA would continue to use federal
                       small farmer in  announcement, the agency acknowledged that   funding as a way to pressure the states to adopt
                        Austin, Texas,  “the vast majority of participants [at the listening   NAIS-type premises registration or technology.
                       and the Execu-  sessions in 2009] were highly critical” of NAIS.   The Secretary answered that he does not intend
                   tive Director of the   The agency listed a wide range of objections to   to use federal funding to penalize states for not
                      Farm and Ranch                                             adopting specific technology or implement NAIS
                    Freedom Alliance.   NAIS, and later referred to the “very legitimate
                      She has a B.S. in   concerns of the American public and those in   through the “back door.” He went on to say that
                         Biology from   Rural America.” Given the agency’s history of   NAIS had received a “failing grade.” This direct
                   Stanford University  characterizing the opposition to NAIS as a lu-  response was a startling change from the circu-
                   and a J.D. from the  natic fringe of naysayers, this admission alone   itous double-talk that USDA officials have used
                    University of Texas  represents a significant change.        throughout the NAIS program.
                    at Austin. She and      We have stopped the train that was heading      We cannot rest on these statements, however,
                         her husband   for us. But that doesn’t end the fight. The train   and we must keep up the pressure at every step
                          run a small                                            to ensure that USDA lives up to what it is now
                     grass-based farm   could re-start —what will the USDA develop as
                    with sheep, cattle,   its new framework? And there are many, many   saying.
                   horses, and heritage   spurs on the rail —what will the States develop
                        breed poultry.  for intrastate programs?                 NAIS ON THE STATE LEVEL
                            For more                                                Moving past USDA’s new framework, we
                    information about  INTERSTATE COMMERCE                       face many potential problems with state pro-
                       NAIS and what      One of the key concerns with USDA’s new   grams. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana have
                        you can do to   framework is the scope of “interstate commerce.”   already implemented portions of NAIS. In Wis-
                         stop it, go to                                          consin, in particular, the case against an Amish
                  www.farmandranch-   In the infamous Wickard v Filburn case in 1942,
                       freedom.org or   the Supreme Court held that a federal agency   farmer, Emanuel Miller, who has objected on
                  call 1-512-243-9404.   could regulate a farmer growing wheat for his   religious grounds, remains pending. Will other
                 80                                         Wise Traditions                                 SPRING 2010
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85