Page 90 - Summer2009
P. 90

poultry or lambs for their own food or as pets.  ers and micro-farmers are not covered. Yet these
                                  Fourth, the study makes unsupported as-  people would be covered by NAIS. The USDA’s
                              sumptions about many of the costs that will be  own premises registration statistics reveal the
                              imposed. For example, the study recognizes that  severe undercounting of affected people. While
                              the cost of RFID readers will not be economical  WKH &HQVXV OLVWV RQO\       ³SUHPLVHV´ LQ 0DV-
                              for small producers, so it advances the premise  sachusetts, the USDA has registered 8,066 prem-
                                                                                                                8
                              that a new business will spring up to do custom  ises in that state—227 percent of the estimate!
                              reading.  It then assumes that there will be cus-  $QG VLQFH WKH FRVW EHQH¿W DQDO\VLV UHOLHV RQ WKH
                                     7
                              WRP WDJ UHDGHU EXVLQHVVHV ZLWKLQ WZHQW\ ¿YH  Census estimates, the estimates of the total costs
                              miles of each small farm, even though ranches  of NAIS—to both individuals and the govern-
                              in the West and Southwest may encompass more  PHQW²DUH IXQGDPHQWDOO\ ÀDZHG
                              WKDQ WZHQW\ ¿YH PLOHV RI WHUULWRU\ HDFK  ,W DOVR     7KLV ZDV D FRVW EHQH¿W DQDO\VLV  VR ZKDW
                              assumes that the cost of RFID reading will be  DERXW WKH EHQH¿W SRUWLRQ" 7KH PDLQ EHQH¿WV
                              comparable to the cost of brand inspections,  discussed by the study are related to the export
                              even though brand inspections do not require  market. Indeed, in identifying the “three key
                              expensive equipment, unlike RFID tagging and  points” from the study, USDA lists the value to
                              UHDGLQJ  %DVHG RQ WKRVH IXQGDPHQWDOO\ ÀDZHG  the export market and the global marketplace
                              assumptions, the study claims that someone with  DV WKH NH\ EHQH¿WV   Not only are the alleged
                                                                                          9
             In essence,      ¿YH KHDG RI FDWWOH ZRXOG SD\ RQO\               EHQH¿WV EDVHG RQ VSHFXODWLRQ UDWKHU WKDQ IDFW
                              per head) to have someone drive out to their farm  this approach is entirely improper. The majority
               individual     and electronically read the tags.          of the costs of NAIS will be borne by individual

                      rural       $QRWKHU ÀDZ RI WKH VWXG\  ZKLFK KDV EHHQ  animal owners ranging from pet owners to large
             Americans’       a recurring issue in many debates about NAIS,  UDQFKHUV  %XW WKH H[SRUW PDUNHW EHQH¿WV ZLOO
                              is the massive underestimation of the number of  accrue almost entirely to a handful of large com-
               version of     “premises” affected by NAIS, and as a result, the  panies who participate in the export market. In
            Main Street       underestimate of the total costs of the program.  essence, individual rural Americans’ version of

           will be taxed      All of the cost estimates are based on data from  0DLQ 6WUHHW ZLOO EH WD[HG IRU WKH EHQH¿W RI %LJ
                              the USDA Census. Yet the USDA Census, by  Ag’s version of Wall Street.
         for the benefit      GH¿QLWLRQ  FRYHUV RQO\ WKRVH RSHUDWLRQV WKDW     ,Q VXPPDU\  WKH 86'$ FRVW EHQH¿W DQDO\VLV
              of Big Ag’s     have $1,000 or more of agricultural product for  is rife with improper statistical manipulations,
               version of     sale in the census year. Not only do many people  unsupported and illogical assumptions, and a
                              fail to respond to the Census, but hundreds of  cavalier disregard for the people who will actu-
            Wall Street.      thousands of hobby animal owners, homestead-  ally bear the costs.



                                                      TAKE ACTION!

              USDA is accepting written comments through the end of June (and possibly longer). You can use our sample comments:
          http://farmandranchfreedom.org/content/Sample-comments. Be sure to personalize them to have the greatest impact!
              Submit comments ONLINE: http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-
          2009-0027. The Federal Register site can be confusing and difficult. Here’s what to do:
                  1)   Click on the yellow balloon under the “add comments” column.
                  2)   Fill out the required fields and type in your comments. If your comments are more than a paragraph or so, we
                     recommend that you first write them in a word document and then copy & paste them into the comments
                     field.
                  3)   Click on “next step.”
                  4)   At the end of the process, you should receive a confirmation number.

              or MAIL to: Attn NAIS, Surveillance and Identification Programs
              National Center for Animal Health Programs, VS, APHIS,
              4700 River Road Unit 200, Riverdale, MD 20737

         88                                         Wise Traditions                               SUMMER 2009
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95