Page 77 - Summer2009
P. 77

All Thumbs Book Reviews








          periods by years; and to win lucrative tax credits     0DUNHWLQJ KDV QR SODFH LQ PHGLFLQH  3HWHUVHQ VD\V ÀDW RXW  6KH FDOOV
          which have allowed them to pay far lower taxes  for science to become honest again, for physicians to stop taking drug
          than other industry groups.               company money, for marketing fraud to be stopped, for patients to arm
              Petersen’s disclosure of facts alongside nu-  themselves with knowledge and independent thinking, and for a revolution
          merous human interest stories are a compelling  WR VWDUW DPRQJ FLWL]HQV DW WKH JUDVVURRWV ZKR ZLOO HOHFW RI¿FLDOV WR GHIHQG
          moral indictment of a corrupt and corrupting  them and their rights.
          “industry.” One can even marvel at the lunacy     She even questions the belief that we need so many pills to be healthy,
          it has created in our medical system: “There is  and wonders whether disease prevention might not be a better route. While
          a kind of madness in it. The drug companies  all of her recommendations are noble, no one can deny that their realization
          pay hundreds of millions of dollars in govern-  is a long way off; in the meantime her book serves to educate and sound
          PHQW ¿QHV IRU SURPRWLQJ WKHLU SURGXFWV LOOHJDOO\  a moral alarm. Following Our Daily Meds with Fight for Your Health:
          and hundreds of millions of dollars more to the  Exposing the FDA’s Betrayal of America by Byron Richards will complete
          families of the victims who suffered or died, then  the picture of corruption in the American medical system as well as bolster
          raise their prices and promote their products even  those who understand that taking full responsibility for one’s health is
          harder.”                                  always the best path.               Review by Katherine Czapp





                                                     THE LIBERATION DIET
                                     By Kevin Brown, CPT, NC & Annette Presley, RD, LD, CPT

               This book covers a wide range of topics—calories, lipid hypotheses, water, salt, soy, exercise, milk and other things.
           Many try to get the facts straight on all these subjects. Few succeed. This one actually succeeds, and succeeds well.
               Some important histories are covered, including the history of the lipid hypothesis and the invention of Crisco. One of
           the most important keys to understanding what is really going on and what is wrong with nutrition today is understanding
           the history of how we got here.
               There is a brief and very instructive section that explains how drugs came to dominate medicine. About one hundred
           years ago Carnegie and Rockefeller, who had a large vested interest in pharmaceuticals, established the accreditation
           system for medical schools. Only schools teaching a pharmaceutical approach to medicine received accreditation. Before
           that there was plenty of competition from natural, homeopathic and nutritional approaches. After that, there was very little
           competition.
               Most Americans put a lot of faith in anyone with a degree and a lot of fancy letters after their name from an accredited
           school. It’s good to know exactly what that really means and how vested interests can appear to be philanthropic while
           influencing entire cultures and educational systems in ways that are not in our best interests.
               Brown and Presley also cover what I call the birth control diet. Reverend Sylvester Graham was a preacher in the 1800s
           who had a thing against sex. He figured out that a vegetarian, grain-based diet reduced sex drive. He and Dr. John Harvey
           Kellogg (also against sex) were instrumental in promoting the base of today’s government approved food pyramid.
               Readers of The Untold Story of Milk by Dr. Ron Schmid will recognize a quick recap of the history of milk in the U.S.
           In the 1930s, salesmen went so far as to show prospective customers samples of partially digested homogenized milk and
           unhomogenized milk, claiming the homogenized milk was better digested. Of course, to obtain these samples, regurgitation
           was necessary at some point. This makes me suspect that Americans didn’t give up their raw milk due to science, safety or
           convenience. They were just desperate to put a stop to this sick Ralph and Earl roadshow. I give this one a thumb up.
                                                                                                  Review by Tim Boyd


          SUMMER 2009                                Wise Traditions                                           75
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82