Page 75 - Summer2015
P. 75

All Thumbs Book Reviews





          Altered Genes, Twisted Truth              tional Academy of Sciences (NAS). It has gotten
          Steven M. Druker                          to the point where anyone who questions the
          Distributed by Chelsea Green Publishing   wisdom of genetic engineering is quickly and
                                                    viciously labeled anti-science. Those who issue
              This tome has received rave reviews from  such statements seem not to notice the obvious
          a number of luminaries, described as one of the  hypocrisy. How dare you question our sacrosanct
          most important books of the last fifty years, a  scientific paradigm, you unwashed heathen?
          compelling page-turner. I can’t promise this  Science in the U.S. for the most part no longer
          would be a page-turner for everyone but it does  studies different views objectively but picks the
          a fantastic job of clearing the fog surrounding  one that suits the prevailing agenda and makes
          the murky topic of genetic engineering. Druker  the most money. The science card has been
          gives a detailed blow-by-blow account of how  played to the hilt. It has become a religion. The
          GMO food has been foisted on the world as fore-  NAS headquarters is referred to as the temple of
          told in the book’s subtitle: “How the Venture to  science.
          Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted     Eisenhower  made  a  well-known  and
          Science, Corrupted Government and Systemati-  prescient statement about the dangers of the
          cally Deceived the Public.”               military-industrial complex. That was just part
              One key to success in the approval of GMO  of a larger, perhaps more important point. He
          food is corruption at the FDA. Not only did the  spoke of the rapidly increasing interconnection
          agency ignore many of the scientific details, they  between scientists and government, and the dan-
          ignored the law. Contrary to popular belief, there  ger that public policy would become if captive to
          is no legal requirement for consumers, FDA, or  a scientific-technological elite.
          anyone else to prove new foods or additives are     Druker details many arguments that reveal
          dangerous. Rather, the producers of the new  the insanity of genetic engineering. It is the tech-
          Frankenfoods must prove that they are safe. That  nological argument he makes toward the end of
          has not even remotely been accomplished. One  the book that I find most compelling.
          of the favorite industry arguments is that genetic     Most would agree that the analogy compar-
          modification is not only safe but can’t be danger-  ing DNA to computer software is about as good
          ous. One of the first instances of genetic tinkering  as we can do. I think most would also agree that   Science in the
          that was released for public consumption was  comparing human-generated software to DNA   U.S. for the
          an L-tryptophan supplement. It was a disaster.  code is like comparing a paper airplane to the   most part no
          People died. Others were made severely ill.  starship Enterprise. The difference is actually
              In another case, Germans developed a soil  more extreme than that but that’s the best I can   longer studies
          bacterium called K. planticola that they hoped  articulate.                          different
          would increase ethanol production. When put     Druker goes into some detail describing how   views
          to the test, all plants exposed to it died. Because  software is developed, maintained and repaired.
          K. planticola is involved in the root systems of  As a computer engineer with much experience   objectively
          all plants and multiplies rapidly, some scientists  in the field I can certify that he is right on. He   but picks the
          believe that its release into the wild could con-  has done his homework well. Newbie software   one that suits
          ceivably wipe out all life on the planet. So much  programmers are prone to writing what we call
          for the claim of inherent safety of GMOs.  spaghetti code. Spaghetti code is very unstruc-  the prevailing
              The Reagan era of relaxed regulation abet-  tured, complicated and unreadable, even to the   agenda and
          ted GMO acceptance nearly everywhere in this  person who wrote it. The code is so intercon-  makes the
          country. Industry also managed to win the favor  nected and elaborate that even the tiniest change
          of prestigious scientific institutions like the Na-  can completely wreck it.        most money.
 Wise Traditions   SUMMER 2015                       Wise Traditions                                           75





   154242_V16N2_text.indd   75                                                                                 6/25/15   3:55 PM
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80