Page 14 - Winter2010
P. 14

Caustic Commentary






               Science and Technology, four scientists from the University  “We need to stop the notion that fat, cuddly, cute babies are a
               of California, San Francisco expressed concerns about the  good thing,” says Dr. Jatinder Bhatia, chairman of the nutri-
               backscatter X-ray airport security scanners, noting the lack  tion committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics. But
               of safety data and the probable increased risk to the elderly,  then Bhatia moans, “I have seen parents putting their infant
               children and adolescents, pregnant women, and those at  and one-year-old on diets becaus of history [of obesity] of
               risk for breast and skin cancer. Potential targets for damage  one parent or another.” The experts have lots of suggestions,
               include the cornea, the thymus and the sperm. They noted  including breastfeeding, frequent checkups at the pediatri-
               that while the X-ray dose from these devices has often been  cian, and withholding the bottle when baby cries-everything
               compared in the media to the cosmic ray exposure inherent  but what growing infants really need, that is, nutrient-dense
               to airplane travel or that of a chest                                      sacred foods to support the opti-
               X-ray, this comparison is very mis-                                        mal development of the endocrine
               leading: both the air travel cosmic                                        system and ensure a complete sup-
               ray exposure and chest Xrays have                                          ply of nutrients so that overeating
               much higher X-ray energies and                                             becomes unnecessary (parentdish.
               the health consequences are appro-                                         com, December 1, 2010).
               priately understood in terms of the
               whole body volume dose. In con-                                            A VICTORY AGAINST GMOs
               trast, these new airport scanners                                          On December 1, a federal district
               are largely depositing their energy                                        judge  issued  a  preliminary  in-
               into the skin and immediately ad-                                          junction ordering the immediate
               jacent tissue, and since this is such                                      destruction of hundreds of acres of
               a small fraction of body weight                                            genetically engineered sugar beet
               and volume, possibly by one to   Tim Eads churns butter and toasts sourdough bread   seedlings planted in September,
                                                  with his amazing foot pedal machine at
               two orders of magnitude, the real          Wise Traditions 2010.           after finding the seedlings had
               dose to the skin is now high. The                                          been planted in violation of federal
               scientists also expressed concern that TSA personnel, already  law. Plaintiffs in the case argued that USDA had violated the
               complaining about resolution limitations, might be tempted to  law by allowing the plantings without analyzing the potential
               raise the dose (www.npr.org/assets/news/2010/05/17/concern.  environmental, health and socioeconomic impacts of growing
               pdf). All passengers have the option to refuse the backscatter  GE sugar beets. A ban on the planting of genetically modified
               X-ray scan, but the alternative is a body pat down which some  alfalfa, imposed in 2007, remains in place (commondereams.
               find embarrassing or invasive. Many citizens are just refus-  org, December 2, 2010).
               ing to fly until the scanning policies are changed. Be sure to
               complain to your representative and senators.
                                                                             FOR SCIENTISTS AND LAy READERS
               DIETS FOR BABIES
               Traditional wisdom deems a chubby baby a healthy baby,      Please note that the mission of the Weston A. Price
               a joy to behold, a baby that asks to be cuddled. Now, with   Foundation is to provide important information about diet
                                                                     and health to both scientists and the lay public. For this
               USDA focusing its beady eyes on infants as well as children   reason, some of the articles in Wise Traditions are neces-
               and adults, claiming that obesity starts in the womb, many   sarily technical. It is very important for us to describe the
               parents are putting their babies on diets. In one extreme case,   science that supports the legitimacy of our dietary prin-
               a Washington state couple was found gilty of starving their   ciples. In articles aimed at scientists and practitioners, we
               baby by putting laxatives in her bottle so she wouldn’t gain   provide a summary of the main points and also put the
               weight. Many parents simply restrict food for their infants,   most technical information in sidebars. These articles are
               especially healthy fats. How can parents be blamed when   balanced by others that provide practical advice to our
               they get such mixed messages from the so-called experts?   lay readers.
               14                                         Wise Traditions                                WINTER 2010





         74240_text.indd   14                                                                                     12/13/2010   2:13:56 AM
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19