Page 25 - Winter2020

words, the virus looks one way when grown on monkey kidney cells, but deficiency virus (HIV) fulfills Koch’s postu-
the same virus looks different when grown on lung cancer cells. That is lates and hence is the proven cause of AIDS.
17
like saying that if you plant some seeds in one garden, you will get toma- The study involved taking blood from an
toes, but if you plant them in another garden, you will get turnips. What HIV-positive person and injecting it into one
this observation tells us is that what the researchers found comes from chimpanzee. The researchers did not purify or
the tissue, not the source “virus”; that is why the “viruses” are different. isolate anything but just injected the blood into
In their concluding remarks, the authors state, “Our report provides one chimpanzee. They then kept the chimp for
the first in situ cryo-ET analysis of coronaviruses at high preservation ten years (and who knows what they fed it or
levels.” Wait a minute—this study was published on June 23, 2020. You anything about its conditions of confinement?).
mean they had no analyses of this virus before health officials called for After ten years, the chimp developed an “oppor-
universal lockdowns? tunistic infection” (which could even have been
By the way, Stefano Scoglio, PhD, from Italy, has come to the same a yeast infection) and tested “HIV-positive” (a
conclusions that we have. In a talk posted on social media entitled “THE test result that can occur in at least thirty-three
INVENTED PANDEMIC, the lack of VIRUS ISOLATION and the IN- other medical conditions). As with so many of
VALID COVID-19 test,” Scoglio says, “At the center of the pandemic the studies we have looked at, this study had no
project stands the Covid swab test, which is based on the RT-PCR (Reverse controls—such as injecting a different chimp
Transcriptase- Polymerase Chain Reaction): a sample of organic material with blood from someone with cancer or from
is taken from the throat, or more rarely from the broncho-alveolar fluid, a healthy person. And this was the proof that
of the individual, and then the presence of the SARS-Cov-2 virus in the HIV causes AIDS! This is not science (but it
sample is tested. This is done by using the same RT-PCR methodology keeps the grant money flowing).
used to originally ‘isolate’ the virus from patient zero. Thus, the Covid With Lyme disease, the “proof” that
test depends essentially on the original isolation, or lack thereof, of the Koch’s postulates were fulfilled comes from a
SARS-Cov-2 virus, the original PCR isolation of the virus constituting paper published in the New England Journal
the golden standard necessary to validate any subsequent Covid test. of Medicine in 1983 that reported detection of
The problems with the original virus isolation, and thus with the ensuing spirochetes (a family of common spiral-shaped
swab test, are many, and they all point to the truth that the SARS-Cov-2 bacteria) in the blood of two Lyme patients.
18
virus has never been isolated and never tested for its pathogenicity.” 16 The researchers then examined some ticks in
the neighborhood and found the same spiro-
KOCH’S POSTULATES IRRELEVANT? chete. That’s it—that was the “proof” of Koch’s
One argument we hear is that Koch’s postulates are irrelevant, out postulates.
of date, useless or even “wrong.” If so, why do researchers claim to have As we have explained, finding bacteria at
satisfied Koch’s postulates, not only for Covid-19 but for other diseases the site of an injury or in a person with a dis-
like HIV/AIDS and Lyme disease? ease in no way constitutes proof of causation,
In 1997, for example, scientists announced that human immuno- any more than finding firemen at the site of a

DID SEMMELWEIS PROVE THE GERM THEORY?

We’ve had numerous objections to The Contagion Myth that invoke the story of Ignaz Semmelweis. Semmelweis
discovered that the incidence of puerperal fever (also known as “childbed fever”) could be drastically cut by the use
of hand disinfection in obstetrical clinics. Puerperal fever was common in mid-19th-century hospitals and often fatal.
Semmelweis proposed the practice of washing hands with chlorinated lime solutions in 1847 while working in Vienna
General Hospital’s First Obstetrical Clinic, where doctors’ wards had three times the mortality of midwives’ wards.
Semmelweis’s practice earned widespread acceptance only years after his death, when Louis Pasteur proposed the
germ theory, and Joseph Lister, acting on the French microbiologist’s research, practiced and operated using hygienic
methods, with great success.
But does the reduction of infections after hand-washing prove the germ theory? At the Vienna General Hospital,
medical students began their day in the morgue performing autopsies on the formaldehyde-soaked bodies of women
who had died in childbirth. Then, without washing their hands, they delivered babies in the obstetrical wards. Their
hands were coated in poisons—not only formaldehyde but also toxins such as ptomane produced by bacteria during
the breakdown of tissue—and this was introduced into the birth canal and broken skin. Why blame bacteria—always
on hand when living tissue is poisoned or decayed—when poison is more than adequate to cause illness and death?

WINTER 2020 Wise Traditions 23