Page 71 - Summer2008
P. 71

All Thumbs Book Reviews







          be “on average ten times higher in vitamins A  the modern food world by ignoring nutritionism as part of the landscape.
          and D than modern diets.” Pollan implies that  You need to understand what it is and be able to know it when you see it
          the discrepancy had to do with the stripping of  or you will soon  nd yourself on the road to nowhere. This is what is so
          nutrients from grains in modern processing, but  valuable about Pollan’s work: It  lls in the map with all the new sideroads
          in so doing ignores the essential point that these  and subdivisions. But your journey to the land of optimal health and hap-
          vitamins are only found in animal fats. However,  piness will be impeded by an uncrossable desert if you ignore guidance
          later on he does observe that organ meats with  from earlier explorers who actually got there.
          their high levels of fat-soluble vitamins were     Price did. And he was unambiguous about the need for animal fats.
          particularly prized. He notes as well the degree     We cannot transform the relationship of humans to the soil, as Pollan
          to which the health of pastoral populations was a  advocates, without adding back the missing link, that most miraculous of

          reection of the quality of the pasture on which  food processors, the grazing animal—a creature who takes leaves from the
          their animals grazed, and the resulting levels of  soil, disassembles and recon gures them, producing foods that contain the
          A and D in their butter.                  optimal balance of an unimaginable variety of nutrients, many of which
              But it is only the connection between the  science hasn’t even identi ed, all packaged in their own appetizing and
          soil and the health of the eaters—the ecological  satisfying nutrient delivery systems: meat, milk, and fat.
          aspects of Price’s work—that Pollan focuses on     This is a food system based on plants. And that is exactly what Pol-
          when making his recommendations. He is con-  lan says we need in order to redress the harm that has been done in the
          tent to leave behind all of Price’s conclusions on  shift from leaves to seeds. But he is in the land of wishful thinking if he
          the value of animal fats, and take away only the  believes we can do this by eating more plants, only a tiny bit of meat, and
          partial truth that “the human animal is adapted  ignoring animal fats. If we follow his directions we will  nd ourselves still
          to, and apparently can thrive on, an extraordinary  in the grips of nutritionism, but this time with the Nutritional Industrial
          range of different diets, but the Western diet,  Complex busily providing us with things like high omega-3 asparagus.
          however you dene it, does not seem to be one  We may not be fat, but you can bet we will be very hungry.

          of them.”                                     We should be grateful that, even though he misses the major import
              He did not see that animal fats are the key  of Dr. Price’s work, he does introduce it to a wider audience; and he does
          to reversing the damage done by industrializing  show that the lipid hypothesis was a  im- am.
          our food supply—and indeed, many of the worst     We should also be grateful that his next book will be about orchids.
          aspects of nutritionism. Animal fats are what is      Reviewed by Ellen Ussery. ©Copyright Ellen Ussery May 20, 2008
          missing in Pollan’s attempt to restore us to our
          proper relationship to food. In this endeavor                      POLLANISMS

          he notes ve different changes that have taken      As a challenge to Pollan’s 2-3-2 word sequence “Eat food. Not
          place since we have industrialized our food sup-  too much. Mostly plants.” a New York Times blog asked participants to
          ply. We have gone from whole foods to rened,   come up with their own “Pollanisms.” Among the ingenious entries:

          from complexity to simplicity, from quality to
          quantity, from leaves to seeds, and from food      Eat pie. Very good pie. Not often.
          culture to food science.                         Spend time. On useful things. Not this.
              In explaining these transformations Pollan      Read Pollan. Take his advice. With salt.

          nds that he must borrow from nutritionism’s re-     Make promises. Don’t break them. Find loopholes.
          ductive vocabulary to delve into the implications        Seek wisdom. Think for yourself. Avoid maxims.
          of a change that he feels is the most egregious of      The winner manages to challenge Pollan’s original edicts and elicit
          all—that from leaves to seeds. He almost apolo-  a laugh: Ate plants. A big heap. Still hungry.
          gizes for doing so. But he needn’t. The fact is, you      And this one from your editor: Eat plants. Always with butter. Or
          can’t unopen Pandora’s box. You can’t navigate   cream.

          SUMMER 2008                                Wise Traditions                                           69
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76