Page 10 - Winter2008
P. 10

Caustic Commentary




                                  Sally Fallon and Mary Enig take on the Diet Dictocrats



         NEW STATIN STUDY: TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE?               publicity for JUPITER increases the number of people tak-
         “A highly anticipated study has produced powerful evidence  ing the statin, business analysts estimate that AstraZeneca’s
         that a simple blood test can spot seemingly healthy people  already $3.5 billion in annual sales for Crestor will double
         who are at increased risk for a heart attack or stroke and  over the next five years. And if the official guidelines are
         that giving them a widely used drug offers potent protection  changed to include CRP as a risk factor, seven to ten million
         against the nation’s leading killers.” So begins a Washington  more American adults could join the ranks of those “at risk
         Post article (November 10, 2008) on the recently published  for heart disease” and needing treatment with statins, which,
         JUPITER study, whose lead author, Paul M. Ridker, claims  to meet federal guidelines, could potentially mean $14 billion
         provides evidence for taking the statin Crestor to lower a sub-  per year for the drug company. P.S. Dr. Ridker, chief author
         stance called C-reactive protein (CRP), considered a marker  of JUPITER, co-invented the CRP test, with Brigham and
         for inflammation. “Compared with those getting the placebo,  Women’s Hospital holding the patent and patent rights having
         those taking Crestor were 54 percent less likely to have a heart  been licensed in part to AstraZeneca.
         attack, 48 percent less likely to have a stroke, 46 percent less
         likely to need angioplasty or bypass surgery to open a clogged  THE CHOLESTEROL RISK FACTOR
         artery, 44 percent less likely to suffer any of those events and  One very interesting fact emerged from the media discussions
         20 percent less likely to die from any cause.” If this sounds  of the JUPITER trial—with JUPITER, cardiologists have fi-
         too good to be true, you are right. Before you rush to your  nally acknowledged that cholesterol levels do not accurately
         doctor to have your CRP levels tested and jump on the statin  reflect a tendency to heart disease. Dr. James Stein, MD, from
         bandwagon, read Sandy Szware’s excellent analysis of the  the University of Wisconsin Medical School in Madison,
         study and its accompanying hype at junkfoodscience.blogspot.  praised the study for exposing the fact that current therapeutic
         com. Key points: the actual differences in outcome were in fact  LDL-cholesterol levels are not only arbitrary, but are in fact
         very small, with the difference in mortality between the statin  a poor indicator of cardiovascular risk. “Most patients with
         and control groups after nearly two years only 0.25 percent;  heart attacks have normal LDL-cholesterol values,” he stated.
         researchers stopped the trial early, just as the projected overall  With the cholesterol theory crumbling, the industry is under
         mortality of the statin group was about to surpass that of the  intense pressure to come up with a new risk factor, and one that
         placebo group; the selection process for trial participants was  can be treated with the same statin drugs they have invested
         so rigorous that it screened out eight of ten seniors recruited,  so much money in. Enter Dr. Ridker and C-reactive protein.
         for conditions ranging from inflammatory disease to “unstated  Ridker has been pushing CRP as an important risk factor to be
         reasons.” Even though participants were screened to exclude  treated with statins for a number of years. But is CRP really
         those with potential “compliance” problems, nearly 15 percent  a risk factor for heart disease, or simply an associated factor?
         of participants had stopped taking their pills after one year; and  Studies indicate the latter. In fact, a National Panel on CRP
         there was a 25 percent higher number of newly diagnosed cases  Testing found no evidence to support the premise that treat-
         of diabetes among the statin group compared to the placebo  ing CRP will improve survival rates (www.urmc.rochester.
         (270 cases versus 216 cases). But the world of cardiology is  edu/pr/News/story.cfm?id=182). Elevated CRP levels are
         breathless: “For the cardiology world, discovering a major  associated with everything from anger and stress to arthritis,
         new risk factor as well as an effective treatment is like hit-  cancer, lupus, inflammatory disease, pneumonia, TB, oral
         ting a walk-off home run to win the World Series,” says Dr.  contraceptive use, pregnancy, heart attacks, surgery, trauma,
         Eugene Braunwald at Brigham and Woman’s Hospital. And  burns, strenuous exercise and many other conditions. They
         the corporate world is rubbing its hands with glee. The stock  are a marker for disease, not a cause, but since statin drugs
         of AstraZeneca, maker of Crestor, climbed 45 percent after  lower CRP levels slightly, you can bet that CRP levels will
         JUPITER was halted last March. The lab test for C-reactive  be the new cholesterol, to be feared, tested for and lowered
         protein costs $50-$80 and Crestor costs $1,400 per year. If  using the dangerous and expensive drugs.
         10                                         Wise Traditions                                WINTER 2008
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15