Page 10 - Spring2010
P. 10

Letters










                    The  cited  deficiencies  yielding  impactful, and they should be reported,  had not yet fully materialized into a
                 “Thumbs Down” appear to be the scenes  like it or not. The objectivity of “Food,  system of farming. Organic farming is
                 on  Kevin’s Law and Wal-Mart. The  Inc.” is its strength, and correspond-  an agroecological farming system that
                 reviewer seems to think the movie is  ingly, the comparative lack of objectivity  cannot be simply defined by that which it
                 arguing on behalf of Kevin’s law, just  is the weakness of “Fresh!”   is not—that is, not chemical agriculture,
                 because it reports on the mother’s at-     I fear that when WAPF hews so  not GMO seed, etc.
                 tempts to fix things. That’s not Kenner’s  predictably to conclusions, like this re-     Organic farming did not cause the
                 argument, that’s the mother’s argument.  view, which are essentially ideological  Tigris and Euphrates Delta to become
                 In fact, the juxtaposition of her later  and which seem to ignore what’s really  a desert. Among the factors contribut-
                 fears of being sued is even more dra-  happening, that the credibility of WAPF  ing to the desertification in that region
                 matic, and stronger, when they are seen  likewise suffers.            was salinization of the soil from salts
                 in the light of her advocacy for Kevin’s                 Steve Bemis  delivered to the land via irrigation wa-
                 law.                                              Ann Arbor, Michigan  ter. When soil scientists study farmland
                    For my money, the message of this                                  converted to organic management, they
                 movie  is  exactly  epitomized  by  her  The reviewer gave an accurate descrip-  generally find that soil quality and or-
                 plight, namely, there is rampant cen-  tion of the movie and his reasons for the  ganic matter content are improved over
                 sorship of discussions about processed  negative review, namely the conflicting  conventional management.
                 food, enshrined in statute, the courts,  messages about the solution to indus-     With that said, I now want to illus-
                 and in the economic power wielded in  trial agriculture. Most of our readers  trate that not only is organic farming not
                 backwater communities which must suf-  would vote for the solution offered in  responsible for the disasters listed, but
                 fer as the food factories of America. The  Fresh!, which is to patronize small farms  that it employs cultural practices that
                 censorship is the story and is incredible,  and  artisan  processors  rather  than  support principles of the WAPF. This
                 and the mother in her conflicted situ-  purchase organic food from Wal-Mart  material would add information to my
                 ation illustrates the seriousness of the  and lobby for laws that could be turned  article on “A History of Organic Farm-
                 problem. Her fear of being sued would  against the small producer.    ing” (Winter 2006).
                 have lost most of its punch if her efforts                                In 1940, Walter Northborne pub-
                 to pass remedial legislation had been left  ORGANIC AGRICULTURE       lished  his  influential  book,  Look  to
                 on the editing room floor.             The article “A Holistic Approach to  the Land in which he coined the word
                    There seems to be a disconnect in  Cancer” (Winter 2009) contains false  “organic” to refer to a holistic farming
                 Tim’s review between the fact that an  statements about organic agriculture. As  system that he envisioned as an alterna-
                 ethical documentary reports something,  an historian of organic farming, I would  tive to the “conventional” agriculture
                 and the content of what is reported. I  like to take this opportunity to correct  that was associated with soil erosion
                 think it’s a more powerful documentary  some of the misinformation embodied  and destruction of natural resources
                 (actually, better overall than “Fresh!”)  in an otherwise interesting article.   occurring on a massive scale, not only
                 because  Kenner  reports  everything     Organic farming certainly did not  within the United States, but around
                 that he’s seeing. “A little more editing”  cause the Dust Bowl. A major factor  the  world.  Around  the  same  time,
                 would have destroyed its credibility as  contributing to the Dust Bowl was plow-  other organic pioneers, including Albert
                 a documentary, because Kenner then  ing of the native prairie. Grain crops  Howard, Eve Balfour, Jerome Rodale,
                 would be seen (correctly) as an ideo-  in the Great Plains around the time of  and Edward Faulkner, published books
                 logue, not a reporter.             the Dust Bowl were not being grown  that  expressed  great  concern  about
                    Likewise, we may not like it, but  organically.  Prior  to  1940,  organic  the destruction of the soil resource. In
                 Wal-Mart’s actions occurred, they were  farming did not yet exist in name and  their publications, they articulated a
                 10                                         Wise Traditions                                 SPRING 2010
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15