Page 29 - Spring2018

3. Gerstner HB, Huff JE. Clinical toxicology of mercury. J Toxicol Environ Health (accessed April 28, 2016).
1977;2:491-526. 27. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “Thimero-
4. Waldron HA. Did the Mad Hatter have mercury poisoning? Br Med J sal and vaccines.” http://www.fda.gov/Biologics-
1983;287:1961. BloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/
5. Grum DK, Kobal AB, Arnerič N et al. Personality traits in miners with past oc- UCM096228#t1 (accessed January 12, 2016).
cupational elemental mercury exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:290- 28. National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).
6. “FAQs about mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines.”
6. Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. http://www.nvic.org/faqs/mercury-thimerosal.aspx
Crit Rev Toxicol 2006;36:609-62. (accessed January 12, 2016).
7. Berlin M, Zalups RK, Fowler BA. Mercury. In: Nordberg GF, Fowler BA, 29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Nordberg M, eds. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 4th ed., pp. 1013–75. “Understanding thimerosal, mercury and vaccine
Amsterdam [etc.]: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2015. safety.” Revised 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/vac-
8. Rooney JP. The retention time of inorganic mercury in the brain—a systematic cines/hcp/patient-ed/conversations/downloads/
review of the evidence. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014;274:425-35. vacsafe-thimerosal-color-office.pdf (accessed Janu-
9. Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Jeffries RA. Adult women's blood mercury concen- ary 12, 2016).
trations vary regionally in the United States: association with patterns of fish 30. Brigelius-Flohé R, Flohé L. Basic principles and
consumption (NHANES 1999-2004). Environ Health Perspect 2009;117:47-53. emerging concepts in the redox control of transcrip-
10. Gump BB, MacKenzie JA, Dumas AK et al. Fish consumption, low-level mer- tion factors. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;15:2335-81.
cury, lipids, and inflammatory markers in children. Environ Res 2012;112:204-11. 31. Price WA. Nutrition and Physical Degeneration
11. Boyle CA, Boulet S, Schieve LA et al. Trends in the prevalence of developmental (8th printing). Lemon Grove, CA: The Price-
disabilities in U.S. children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics 2011;127:1034-42. Pottenger Nutrition Foundation; 2011.
12. Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. 32. Fallon Morell S, Cowan TS. The Nourishing Tradi-
Lancet Neurol 2014;13:330-8. tions Book of Baby and Child Care. Washington,
13. Schubert J, Riley EJ, Tyler SA. Combined effects in toxicology. A rapid sys- DC: New Trends Publishing; 2013.
tematic testing procedure: cadmium, mercury, and lead. Toxicol Environ Health 33. Shanahan C, Shanahan L. Deep Nutrition: Why
1978;4:763-76. Your Genes Need Traditional Food. Lawai, HI: Big
14. Haley BE. Mercury toxicity: genetic susceptibility and synergistic effects. Medi- Box Books; 2008.
cal Veritas 2005:2;535-42. 34. Burk RF, Hill KE. Selenoprotein P: an extracel-
15. Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. The biological basis of autism spectrum disorders: lular protein with unique physical characteristics
understanding causation and treatment by clinical geneticists. Acta Neurobiol and a role in selenium homeostasis. Annu Rev Nutr
Exp 2010;70:209-26. 2005;25:215-35.
16. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). Elemental mercury and 35. Westphal GA, Schmuch A, Schulz TG et al.
inorganic mercury compounds: human health aspects. International Labour Homozygous gene deletion of the glutathione S-
Organization, United Nations Environment Programme and World Health transferases M1 and T1 as associated with thimero-
Organization; 2003. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/en/cicad50.pdf sal sensitization. Int Arch Occup Environ Health
(accessed Dec. 29, 2015). 2000;73:384-88.
17. Mortazavi G, Mortazavi SM. Increased mercury release from dental amalgam 36. Hooker B, Kern J, Geier D et al. Methodological
restorations after exposure to electromagnetic fields as a potential hazard for issues and evidence of malfeasance in research
hypersensitive people and pregnant women. Rev Environ Health 2015;30:287-92. purporting to show thimerosal in vaccines is safe.
18. Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Russo JE, Martin MD, Farin FM. Genetic polymorphisms Biomed Res Int 2014; Article ID 247218.
affecting susceptibility to mercury neurotoxicity in children: summary find- 37. Kern JK, Geier DA, Audhya T, King PG, Sykes LK,
ings from the Casa Pia Children’s Amalgam clinical trial. Neurotoxicology Geier MR. Evidence of parallels between mercury
2014;44:288-302. intoxication and the brain pathology in autism. Acta
19. Homme K, Kern JK, Haley B et al. New science challenges old notion that dental Neurobiol Exp 2012;72:113-53.
amalgam is safe. Biometals 2014:27;19-24. 38. Adams JB, Romdalvik J, Ramanujam VMS, Le-
20. European Commission Health and Food Safety Scientific Committees. Final gator MS. Mercury, lead, and zinc in baby teeth
opinion on dental amalgam. April 29, 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientif- of children with autism versus controls. J Toxicol
ic_committees/consultations/public_consultations/scenihr_consultation_24_en Environ Health A 2007;70:1046-51.
(accessed June 18, 2015). 39. Pfaender S, Grabrucker AM. Characterization of
21. Kern JK, Geier DS, Bjørklund G et al. Evidence supporting a link between dental biometal profiles in neurological disorders. Metal-
amalgams and chronic illness, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and suicide. Neuro lomics 2014;6:960-77.
Endocrinol Lett 2014;35:537-52. 40. Malter R. The Strands of Health: A Guide to Un-
22. Geier DA, King PG, Hooker BS, et al. Thimerosal: clinical, epidemiologic and derstanding Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis. Cot-
biochemical studies. Clin Chim Acta 2015;444:212-20. tonwood, AZ: Educational and Health Resources
23. American Academy of Pediatrics. Thimerosal in vaccines—an interim report of Arizona; 2002.
to clinicians. Pediatrics 1999;104:570-4. 41. Carocci A, Rovito N, Sinicropi MS, Genchi G.
24. Rice DC. The U.S. EPA reference dose for methylmercury: sources of uncertainty. Mercury toxicity and neurodegenerative effects.
Environ Res 2004;95:406-13. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 2014;229:1-18.
25. Budtz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P, Weihe P. Separation of risks and benefits of 42. Farina M, Avila DS, da Rocha JBT, Aschner M.
seafood intake. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:323-7. Metals, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: a
26. World Health Organization. Mercury in health care. Policy paper, August 2005. focus on iron, manganese and mercury. Neurochem
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/mercurypolpaper.pdf Int 2013; 62(5):575-94.

SPRING 2018 Wise Traditions 27